<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Comment policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-comment-policy</link>
	<description>James Hoffmann&#039;s blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: New Comment policy by James Hoffmann &#124; Weak Bladder</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-96381</link>
		<dc:creator>New Comment policy by James Hoffmann &#124; Weak Bladder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-96381</guid>
		<description>[...] New Comment policy by James Hoffmann   Posted by root 4 hours ago (http://www.jimseven.com)        I had a link near the comment box saying comment policy jimseven uses modern designed by ulf pettersson and powered by wordpress        Discuss&#160;  &#124;&#160; Bury &#124;&#160;    News &#124; New Comment policy by James Hoffmann [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New Comment policy by James Hoffmann   Posted by root 4 hours ago (<a href="http://www.jimseven.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jimseven.com</a>)        I had a link near the comment box saying comment policy jimseven uses modern designed by ulf pettersson and powered by wordpress        Discuss&nbsp;  |&nbsp; Bury |&nbsp;    News | New Comment policy by James Hoffmann [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ant - Facts About Ants</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-96055</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ant - Facts About Ants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-96055</guid>
		<description>I totally feel you, mate! One of my blogs has been flooded with BS ever since I turned dofollow on and added the &quot;Top Commenters&quot; plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally feel you, mate! One of my blogs has been flooded with BS ever since I turned dofollow on and added the &#8220;Top Commenters&#8221; plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top work</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-95929</link>
		<dc:creator>Top work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-95929</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top work...&lt;/strong&gt;

Excellent, just gotta recomend this....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top work&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Excellent, just gotta recomend this&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kai Lo</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-95892</link>
		<dc:creator>Kai Lo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-95892</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m assuming you are doing some kind of DoFollow because you have Top Commentator plugin. That is the price people pay for DoFollow policies, but at the same time, DoFollow really encourage more people to participate in posting comments. Can&#039;t expect everyone to have valuable things to say. If you are talking about spam like &quot;Great post!!!&quot;, then I understand how you feel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming you are doing some kind of DoFollow because you have Top Commentator plugin. That is the price people pay for DoFollow policies, but at the same time, DoFollow really encourage more people to participate in posting comments. Can&#8217;t expect everyone to have valuable things to say. If you are talking about spam like &#8220;Great post!!!&#8221;, then I understand how you feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electrical Test Equipment</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-95871</link>
		<dc:creator>Electrical Test Equipment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-95871</guid>
		<description>I  got your understanding that comment spam can be pretty big problem for your but this is complete exposure you site in the  public eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  got your understanding that comment spam can be pretty big problem for your but this is complete exposure you site in the  public eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-95843</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-95843</guid>
		<description>WTF James? My comments were pretty constructive. I&#039;m not sure why you chose to delete them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF James? My comments were pretty constructive. I&#8217;m not sure why you chose to delete them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Lister</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-95821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-95821</guid>
		<description>Comment spam is definitely something I do not enjoy taking care of! If you&#039;re blog was dofollow, I&#039;m sure you would&#039;ve taken this step ages ago!

Anyways, would you mind telling us what qualifies as a legitimate comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment spam is definitely something I do not enjoy taking care of! If you&#8217;re blog was dofollow, I&#8217;m sure you would&#8217;ve taken this step ages ago!</p>
<p>Anyways, would you mind telling us what qualifies as a legitimate comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Jadhav</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-95749</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Jadhav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-95749</guid>
		<description>Ya please clarify what is your criteria for choosing spam comments as my comments were deleted even when it wasnt a spam comment

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya please clarify what is your criteria for choosing spam comments as my comments were deleted even when it wasnt a spam comment</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fish Recipe</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-95746</link>
		<dc:creator>Fish Recipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-95746</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great to hear that you are tightening up the reigns on the commenting, and getting rid of commentators are spamming, and leaving worthless comments. I know in the past, when I ran my own personal blog, I too had to do this, but the one thing I did differently though, is that I openly expressed to my readers, what exact type of comments I would approve and what type of comments I would not. I had a link near the comment box saying &quot;comment policy&quot;, and you&#039;d be surprised how much that cut down on some of the spammers who would just leave comments like &quot;nice post&quot; or &quot;thank you&quot; etc.

I hope this helps!

Till then,

Jean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great to hear that you are tightening up the reigns on the commenting, and getting rid of commentators are spamming, and leaving worthless comments. I know in the past, when I ran my own personal blog, I too had to do this, but the one thing I did differently though, is that I openly expressed to my readers, what exact type of comments I would approve and what type of comments I would not. I had a link near the comment box saying &#8220;comment policy&#8221;, and you&#8217;d be surprised how much that cut down on some of the spammers who would just leave comments like &#8220;nice post&#8221; or &#8220;thank you&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>I hope this helps!</p>
<p>Till then,</p>
<p>Jean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Vegas</title>
		<link>http://www.jimseven.com/2009/03/01/new-comment-policy/#comment-95745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Vegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jimseven.com/?p=849#comment-95745</guid>
		<description>Out of curiousity, what would you consider a legitimate comment? I just noticed you deleted the majority of the comments here and most seemed pretty legitimate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiousity, what would you consider a legitimate comment? I just noticed you deleted the majority of the comments here and most seemed pretty legitimate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

